Catherine Williams La Trobe University
Having recently returned from a four-month research trip to Italy, I’ve been reflecting on my experiences in the hope that my own mistakes might save other researchers who, like me, are just starting out, both time and frustration:
Further reflections…
On interviewing research subjects:
When you’re using human research subjects, regardless of their professionalism it’s difficult to avoid them having human responses to you and your questions. Try to read them to understand where the boundary is that you shouldn’t cross if you don’t want to risk engendering hostility; if you have a risky question, save it for last! Otherwise, subjects’ responses to your remaining questions may be compromised and you risk damaging your rapport with them (which can have consequences for both the honesty of subjects’ responses and their generosity with their time). I was aware that one of my questions was borderline, and in the end only felt I was able to ask it (at the conclusion of the interview) of a small number of research subjects who demonstrated to me that they would be inclined to respond honestly.
On research relating to anti-mafia legislation in Italy:
As a very preliminary observation specific to my own field, it would appear that generalizing results about the consequences of anti-mafia legislative initiatives from a specific mafia association of Italian origin to mafia associations of Italian origin generally, is problematic – not only because of the differences between the mafias, but also because of the differences in prosecutorial approaches to managing the tools provided by the Italian Parliament to combat organized crime.
*All of the foregoing was based entirely on my own personal experience and may not be applicable in all cases. Please add your own tips to this list!