Blog Layout

La legge è uguale per tutti…or is it?

Catherine Williams • Jan 16, 2013

Catherine Williams   La Trobe University

Upon hearing that Italy’s Constitutional Court has today released the reasons for its decision on the conflict between the powers of the President and the powers of Palermo’s Office of Public Prosecutions, the first thing that came to my mind was that comforting phrase inscribed on all Italian courts of law: ‘ la legge  è  uguale per tutti’  (a maxim of such importance it is even given a constitutional guarantee in Article 3 of the Italian Constitution).

The conflict at the centre of the case arose after Palermo’s Office of Public Prosecutions inadvertently intercepted phonecalls to President Giorgio Napolitano while tapping ex-Minister Nicola Mancino’s phone as part of their investigations into the  trattativa Stato-Mafia  (four conversations with Napolitano were intercepted, and their content was deemed by the investigators involved to be innocuous). The Court had already determined (back in early December 2012) that conversations and other communications of the Italian Head of State are endowed with absolute confidentiality and cannot be intercepted, but only today has it released the 49-page elaboration of its reasons (see: http://www.cortecostituzionale.it/actionSchedaPronuncia.do ). According to the Court, article 90 of the Constitution and article 7 of Law 219/1989 forbid any wiretapping (even indirect) of the President’s conversations, except in cases of high treason or an attack on the Constitution: article 90 provides the President with a partial immunity, absolving him of responsibility for acts undertaken in the exercise of his functions (save the two above exceptions – high treason or an attack on the Constitution), while according to the Court, article 7(3) of Law 219/1989 ( New norms on ministerial crimes and crimes contemplated by article 90 of the Constitution ) absolutely forbids the intercepting of the President’s telephone conversations or other communications without the Court’s prior permission.*

The Court held further that ‘far from constituting an “inadmissible privilege” […] infringing upon the principle of citizens’ equality before the law, the immunity in question [that contained in article 90] is instrumental to the carrying out of the high-level tasks the Constitution demands of the President’.  Though the Court’s statement seems to suggest the contrary, the fact that some immunity is granted and may be instrumental to the President’s functions does not  ipso facto  render that immunity consistent with the principle of equality of all citizens before the law. The argument has been rendered deceptively complicated, but at its core is a simple, straightforward logic: either the law is the same for all, or it isn’t. If Tizio and Caio’s telephone calls can be intercepted legally, but the President’s cannot, then the law is not the same for Tizio and Caio, and the President: Tizio and Caio are subject to the law, but the President is above it. To pretend otherwise is to make even more of a mockery of the maxim than has already been made over the last two decades. It would seem that Beppe Grillo said it best when he declared that the law isn’t the same for all: it’s the same for all the others.

*  Prima facie it looks as though there may be a question of interpretation concerning whether Law 219/1989 is even relevant to the circumstances of the case: given that both the title of Law 219/1989 and the title of the Part of it cited by the Court clearly state that they apply only to the crimes contemplated by Article 90 (high treason and attack on the Constitution), their application should arguably be limited to investigations into those crimes rather than investigations generally.

04 Mar, 2024
Open until 14 April 2024, the exhibition Emerging From Darkness: Faith, Emotion and The Body in the Baroque is presented at Victoria's Hamilton Gallery (on the unceded lands of the Eastern Maar and Gunditjmara peoples), in partnership with the National Gallery of Victoria (NGV). Unprecedented, and monumental in scope, Emerging From Darkness brings together an exceptional group of works from public and private collections in Australia. It was curated by Associate Professor David R. Marshall , Principal Fellow in Art History at the University of Melbourne, Dr Lisa Beaven , Adjunct Senior Research at La Trobe University, and Laurie Benson , Senior Curator of International Art at the NGV. Here two curators explain some of the project’s background and aims.
27 Oct, 2023
In Italy this year there has been no shortage of Manzoni celebrations, particularly in Milan . And in Australasia? Dr Stefano Bona , Lecturer in Italian Studies at Flinders University, Adelaide, on the lands of the Kauna nation, has lately been involved in creating a ‘special miniseries’ of radio programmes about Alessandro Manzoni. Now available for listening on demand are two longform interviews with Stefano Pratola at Radio Italiana 531 AM. Here Stefano Bona shares some background to this podcast project.
14 Sep, 2023
Announcing, with great pleasure, the winners of the 2023 ACIS Publication Prize for an established scholar, and the 2023 Jo-Anne Duggan Prize. ACIS awards both prizes every two years . In this case, each winning publication addresses the theme of mobility – a fast-evolving direction in Italian Studies research – and each brings forward a topic with clear contemporary significance.
04 Sep, 2023
The 12th Biennial Conference of the Australasian Centre for Italian Studies will be held at the Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, from Wednesday 3 July to Saturday 6 July 2024. The conference theme is ‘Italian Studies for Global Challenges: Transdisciplinary Conversations’.
24 Aug, 2023
Open to postgraduate and early career researchers, since 2018 the ACIS Save Venice Fellowship programme has been enlivening close links between Australasia and the city of Venice. Fellowship applications were suspended in 2022, for pandemic-related reasons. So it is a special pleasure to announce that Brigette De Poi has been awarded an ACIS Save Venice Fellowship for 2023. Already living in Venice to focus on her PhD project, Brigette shares some first reflections on her contact with Save Venice thus far.
08 Aug, 2023
Which memories are allowed to circulate in a particular culture – and which are relegated or silenced? What political logic is at play when a certain way of remembering is spelt out, even imposed? Matthew Topp was awarded an ACIS Postgraduate Scholarship in 2020, to source archival records for his doctoral thesis, which has the working title ‘ Ars Oblivionalis : A Study of Cultural Forgetting in Renaissance Italy’. Now returned from fieldwork, he shares a brief account of his PhD project and travels.
By Catherine Kovesi 02 Apr, 2023
Two promising early career scholars – Lauren Murphy and Julia Pelosi-Thorpe – were the recipients of ACIS Save Venice Fellowships. Delayed due to COVID travel restrictions, they were finally able to access their Fellowships in 2022. Here they both reflect on their time in Venice and the benefits of the Fellowship to their respective research projects.
By Catherine Kovesi 29 Mar, 2023
ACIS is delighted to announce that Professor Andrea Rizzi has been appointed the new Chair of the Australasian Centre for Italian Studies. He leads a renewed Management Committee with several new appointees who start their terms of office this year.
By Catherine Kovesi 30 Jan, 2023
After a hiatus of three years due to travel restrictions, ACIS is delighted once again to be able to offer its Postgraduate Scholarships for Research in Italy. Two promising postgraduate students have been awarded scholarships in the current round: Brigette De Poi and Laura Di Blasi.
Show More
Share by: